Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bouchard v. Price

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 5, 1997No. 95-205-AppealPublished

1ConcurrenceFlanders, Justice

I concur in the result reached by the court and with the majority’s affirmance of the Superior Court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims for wrongful death, for unjust enrichment, and for alleged violations of the Slayer’s Act. However, I write separately because I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Criminal Royalties Distribution Act (the criminal royalties act or the act), G.L.1956 chapter 25.1 of title 12, applies to juvenile defendants. Therefore, I do not believe that the court should declare the act to be unconstitutional be*679cause in my judgment such a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rhode Island Ophthalmological Society v. CannonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  2. Kastal v. Hickory House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
  3. Parkway Towers Associates v. GodfreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. In Re MichaelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. In Re John D.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API