Legal Opinion

Almerico v. Katsanis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1984No. 84-CA-39PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

458 So.2d 158 (1984)

Don ALMERICO

v.

Janet KATSANIS, Diane E. Lambert, and Dorothy Lambert Winingham.

No. 84-CA-39.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

October 11, 1984.

Don Almerico, Destrehan, for appellee.

James H. Minge, New Orleans, for appellants.

Before KLIEBERT, BOWES and GRISBAUM, JJ.

GRISBAUM, Judge.

This is a matter regarding attorney fees. Two issues are presented:(1) Whether the trial court erred in awarding $2500 in attorney fees in connection with a succession matter.(2) Whether the trial court erred in awarding an additional $600 in attorney fees in accordance with R.S. 9:2781…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Watson v. CookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. COMMERCIAL CREDIT CLAIMS SER., INC. v. RichardsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. LaBove v. TheriotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Lutz v. Jefferson Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Reed v. VerwoerdtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Texas Bank of Beaumont v. BozorgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Barre v. St. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API