Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crotty v. Eeading Industries, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, 469Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Price, J.:

I dissent. Though I agree, generally, with the majority’s delineation of the facts, there are certain areas upon which I feel compelled to elaborate. Appellant’s employer, Aetna Standard Engineering Company (Aetna) was a manufacturer of various types of machinery for use in mills. Appellant began working for Aetna in 1948 as a wire-drawing expert, but subsequent to 1956, he worked as a field engineer. As such, his duties consisted of troubleshooting1 and starting up and installing new equipment for customers of Aetna.

Appellee was one of Aetna’s customers, having…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darrah v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API