Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 17, 2009No. 4D08-1422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state appeals from a final order granting William Anderson, Jr.’s, motion for discharge based upon a speedy trial violation. Because Anderson never filed the requisite “Notice of Expiration of Speedy Trial Time” as the applicable rule specifically requires, we reverse.

The state filed a three-count Information against Anderson charging him with possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana, and reckless driving.

Rule 3.191(a), Fla. R.Crim. P., provides that “[e]very person charged with a crime shall be brought to trial within 90 days of arrest if the crime charged is a misdemeanor, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DemarsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Quallo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mark Elliott v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API