Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Sandoval

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1982Published

1ConcurrenceKassal, J.

I concur in the result, but I take this opportunity to express my views pertaining to the inappropriate use of the expression “to a moral certainty” in instructing a jury. I object to its use whether or not such phrase is appended to the words “beyond a reasonable doubt” or if used in connection with the pattern charge given for the evaluation of circumstantial evidence. Judge Fuchsberg recently took cognizance of the inherent difficulties encountered when a Trial Judge instructs a jury in language containing the phrase “ ‘to a moral certainty’ ” (People v Gonzalez, 54 NY2d 729, 730). One of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. HicksNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API