Legal Opinion

Woodbury v. Yeaton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 12, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

Action in bastardy, heard with jury. On exception to refusal of presiding Justice to direct a verdict for defendant be*148cause of variance between allegations and proof, and upon the further ground that complainant failed to show compliance with condition precedent to the maintenance of her action. The declaration alleged that “being put upon the discovery of the truth during the time of her travail, she accused said Frank T. Yeaton, the respondent, of being the father of said child.” The child was delivered by Caesarean operation while the complainant was under anesthetics, and no accusation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Booth v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  2. Eveleth v. GillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  3. Harty v. MalloySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  4. Macurda v. Lewiston Journal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  5. Sessions v. FosterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thut v. GrantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  2. Inman v. WillinskiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  3. Gladys C. v. Robert L.New York Family Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API