Clark v. Bee Line, Inc.

Defendants appeal from an order which denied their motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the contract on which the action is founded is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1) ;■ or, in the alternative, to strike out certain portions of the amended complaint as frivolous and irrelevant; to require plaintiff separately to state and number the alleged causes of action set forth in the amended complaint; and to-make more definite and certain the allegations in .paragraph “Seventh” of the amended complaint. Order reversed on the law,…