The Hiram
District Court, S.D. Alabama
In Admiralty. Suit to recover damages for injury to cargo.
1Opinion of the Court
TOULMIN, District Judge.
There is no claim in this case that the vessel was unseaworthy at the time she sailed with the cargo *139on board, or that tbe damage complained' of was caused from the unseaworthiness of the vessel during the voyage; and it appears that she was not unseaworthy when taking the cargo aboard, but that she was discovered to he so while being prepared to receive the cargo. On the discovery of a leak in the water tank, she was considered unseaworthy, and the master stopped the work of prep-' ara lion for cargo, and proceeded at once to repair the tank. The contention of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Scott v. Ira ChaffeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1880
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. EuripidesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1892
- The T. A. GoddardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- The Georg DumoisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The SaturnusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Thebideau v. CairnsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1909
- The SaturnusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917