Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Bratton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner failed to establish entitlement to such benefits by demonstrating that his loss of hearing was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, which is a prerequisite to a grant of accident disability pension benefits (Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees, 60 NY2d 347, 352; Matter of Ortiz v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 173 AD2d 237, lv denied 78 NY2d 864). Petitioner’s participation in firing exercises at the firing range was a part of her routine duties as a police officer and the hearing loss sustained as a result was not the kind of sudden and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lichtenstein v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Canfora v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Hambel v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Ortiz v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Schussler v. CoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoehl v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API