Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Miklos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2017No. Com. v. Miklos, D. No. 978 WDA 2016PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STRASSBURGER, J.:

David Miklos (Appellant) appeals nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence entered April 20, 2015, after he was found guilty of persons not to possess a firearm. We affirm.

The trial court summarized the evidence offered at trial as follows.

The Commonwealth called Officer Anthony Beatty to testify. Officer Beatty has been employed by the City of Pittsburgh Police, Zone 1, for over seven years. Zone 1 encompasses all of the North Side, from the North Shore to Brighton Heights. He was working as an officer on the night of February 10, 201[4] when he received a call…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZirkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. DisalvoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. DowningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Com. v. Lineman, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. McIntyre, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Com. v. Lineman, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. McIntyre, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API