Commonwealth v. Cromartie
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Spaulding, J.:
I concur with the result reached by the majority, but believe that factors not raised in the majority opinion should be discussed.
First, the majority assumes that the subject of controversy here is both the brown envelope and the marijuana which it allegedly contained. However, the opinion of the court below indicates that its decision to grant the demurrer was based on the Commonwealth’s failure to produce the brown envelope alone. By lumping together the two items — the envelope and the drugs —the majority fails to focus on the precise issue raised *281in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. James W. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Annie Jo Burney and Archie Burney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Commonwealth v. GazalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- William Driggers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967