Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Stidham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2000No. 1999-1156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 455.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. STIDHAM. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Stidham,

2000-Ohio-476.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Two-year suspension with second year stayed— Failure to deposit client funds into an identifiable bank account—Failure to maintain records of funds and render appropriate accounts—Failure to promptly pay funds that client is entitled to receive—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Failure to seek lawful objectives of client— Failure to carry out contract of employment—Prejudicing or damaging…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. StidhamOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Allen County Bar Ass'n v. LinnonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. BuckleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API