Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 25, 1906Published

Appeal from District Harrison.— IIon. O. D. Wheeler, Judge. The opinion states the case. From a judgment in favor, of intervener, the plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Bishop, J.—

The action is at law and was commenced. 5v plaintiff to recover of defendant, John W. Taylor, a sum due on a rent account. A writ of attachment was issued under which the First National Bank of Missouri Valley was garnished, and the bank answered that it was indebted to said Taylor on a deposit account in the sum of $163.70. Said Taylor made no defense to the action, and there was *486judgment against him for the amount sued for. Sarah A. Taylor, wife of John W., intervened, claiming that the money on deposit in the bank was her property, and not subject to appropriation to satisfy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Bacon & Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Shaver Wagon & Carriage Co. v. HalstedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API