Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

George Mefford v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1967No. 16692_1Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEdwards, Circuit Judge

I concur with much of Judge McAllister’s opinion in this case — particularly in reaffirmance of this court’s views as stated in Miracle v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 361 (C.A.6, 1965) and Massey v. Celebrezze, 345 F.2d 146 (C. A.6, 1965).

I find it necessary, however, to add a few comments. In Collins v. Gardner, 373 F.2d 727 (C.A.6, 1967), we reiterated this court’s support for the case referred to above. There we dealt with an ex-coal miner suffering from second degree silicosis and thus disabled from performing his previous lifetime occupation. But we held that where the record contained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William T. Miracle v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. Carl Massey v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  3. Amos P. Collins v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API