Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Multnomah Railway Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Lord, J.:

The existence of the plaintiffs’ ferry, known as the Albina *345ferry, is admitted by the record. The petition of the defendants rests their application in chief upon the insufficiency of the facilities, as already existing and established, for the accommodation of the public in crossing the river, between the termini of the Albina ferry. As a link to connect the line of travel between these points, the averment is that the facilities are too limited to meet the present and growing demands of the public convenience. The order of the county court not only assumes the legal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Conway v. Taylor'sSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Nelson v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  5. Benson v. MayorNew York Supreme Court · 1850

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. TigheNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Evans v. KroutingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State Highway Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Boyer v. BurtonOregon Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API