Legal Opinion

Scott v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1959No. 7830PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

This is habeas corpus. The petitioner, an attorney, was by the magistrate court of Howell County fined ten dollars for contempt of court and upon refusal to pay such fine was committed to jail. The return to the writ sets out the order of commitment, which is as follows:

“Whereas, Wm. C. Scott, Attorney at law, did, on the 26th day of August, 1959, conduct himself in a disorderly, contemptuous and insolent behavior during a session of Magistrate Court of Howell County, Missouri, in the presence of the Court, the Prosecuting Attorney and audience, by then and there accusing1 the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. In re ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Lyons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. Gallagher v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tannenbaum v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Glenn v. HendrixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Ex parte MilesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API