Legal Opinion

Cheever v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The sole question in this case is, whether the persons named executors in an instrument purporting to be the last will and testament of Hiram Arnold, deceased, may ■appeal from the order of the probate court disallowing the same, notwithstanding all persons who would be interested as heirs or distributees in case the decedent had died intestate, and all living persons whom the instrument purports to make beneficiaries, unite in a settlement of the estate .and oppose the •appeal. The circuit court held that they could not, and dismissed the appeal which, in due form, they had attempted to take.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Comstock v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Moll v. GoedekeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. In Re Will of HoughOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Cowan v. BeansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API