Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Saenz
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 17, 1992No. 91-3265PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
In this appeal, the defendant argues that his motion to withdraw his guilty plea was erroneously denied. The defendant contends that an error in the district court’s warning about the mandatory minimum term of his supervised release entitles him to withdraw his plea. Based on the circumstances in this case we disagree. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s decision.
On May 10, 1991, pursuant to a written plea agreement, Robert Saenz pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess and distribute 500 pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The plea agreement provided-…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Max Allen EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Joe Allen BoundsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Nicholas BachynskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Daryl O. McCleese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James P. LedonneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Errol J. Jackson, Milton L. Freeman, and Frenchie R. BeckumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ernest WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Rufino Garcia, Miguel Vaca and Federico RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.