Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Woodside Construction, Inc., an Alaska Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
This case arose when Donald Galt signed a deed of trust note twice and signed a contract of guaranty twice. The FDIC claims that Galt is liable for $912,000, first because he signed the note as an endorser or, alternately, because he signed the contract of guaranty as a guarantor. Galt claims that all of his signatures were in a representative capacity and that he did not sign individually as an endorser or as a guarantor. The FDIC maintains that one of the signatures on the note and one of the signatures on the contract of guaranty were signed in Galt’s individual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Verco IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Tennessee Wildcat Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Turner v. TerryMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- American International Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Feder v. Lazar (In re Lazar)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- American International Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Choy v. Ribeiro CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.