Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1915No. Calendar No. 26,300PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Mandamus by John P. Hayes against Oramel B. Fuller, auditor general of the State of Michigan, to require the respondent to issue a warrant upon the State treasurer for the salary of said Hayes as county agent of Kent county.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The question involved is admirably stated in the brief of the attorney general as follows:

“The relator is the county agent of the State board of corrections and charities for the county of Kent. He seeks by this proceeding to compel the auditor general to pay him the salary fixed by Act 115 of the Public Acts of 1913, being ‘An act to fix the salaries of the county agents of the State board of corrections and charities appointed in and for counties having a population of one hundred fifty thousand or more, and to repeal all acts or parts of acts contravening the provisions' of this act.’
“The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Dingeman v. LacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Anderson v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Henderson v. KoenigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. People v. BrazeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Tribbett v. Village of MarcellusMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. City of Allegan v. Consumers' Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  4. Mulloy v. Wayne County Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API