Legal Opinion
Harding v. Summit Medical Center
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 23, 2001No. C-00-3256 VRWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
Currently before the court is a motion filed by defendant Summit Medical Center and joined by defendant Health Advocates to dismiss plaintiff Dynice Harding’s first amended complaint. The court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Civil LR 7 — 1(b). As a result, the hearing scheduled for March 22, 2001, at 2:00 pm is VACATED. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
I
In Harding’s original complaint, she accused defendants of violating federal and state laws by collecting money from her through a lien on a personal injury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cigna Healthplan of Louisiana, Inc. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. State of Louisiana, Ex Rel. Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cabral Vs. Caesars Entm'T Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020