American Steel Foundries v. Sech
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Lake Superior Court; Virgil E. Reiter, Judge. Action by John Seek against tke American Steel Foundries. From a judgment for plaintiff, tke defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDausman, C. J.
The following specific contentions are urged:(1) That the answers to eleven of the interrogatories are not sustained by sufficient evidence; and that said eleven interrogatories are answered “in such a way as to show bias, prejudice and improper motives.”
1. The answers to the particular interrogatories designated are in harmony with the verdict; and appellant is not contending in this court that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. Therefore, this contention really presents nothing for our consideration. Sievers v. Peters, etc., *541Lumber Co. (1898), 151 Ind. 642, 50 N. E. 877,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Southern Indiana Gas Co. v. TynerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Taylor v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Vandalia Coal Co. v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SHELBY NAT'L. BK., ADM. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Baker v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Bandy v. MYERSIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
- Lahr v. BroylesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Baker v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919