Legal Opinion
Morales v. Greiner
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 28, 2003No. 1:02-cv-01160PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KORMAN, Chief District Judge,
Petitioner Raul Morales (“Morales”) and petitioner Jamal McRae (“McRae”) each seek a writ of habeas corpus primarily on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. I have consolidated these independent cases for the purpose of addressing an issue common to the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment. Specifically, the issue is whether a defendant who alleges that counsel was ineffective because he failed to raise an illegal search and seizure claim or make a Batson challenge can satisfy the requisite…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lopez v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Stewart Roy Yazzie v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- People v. VincentyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Carmichael v. ChappiusDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- People v. CarmichaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.