Opinion No. (1988)
Missouri Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Mr. Koupal:
This opinion is in response to your questions asking:
I. To what extent, if any, do the provisions of section 610.021(1) RSMo as contained in House Committee Substitute for Senate Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2 require a public governmental body to make public votes taken in a properly closed meeting.
a. a vote is taken to close (i.e., terminate without action) an investigation of a formal complaint which has been filed with a licensing board and properly logged as a complaint pursuant to the provisions of section 620.010.15(6) RSMO 1986 when the meeting was closed to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Beiser Ex Rel. Beiser v. Parkway School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State Ex Rel. D.M. v. HoesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- A.B. v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.