Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1988)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided March 9, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Mr. Koupal:

This opinion is in response to your questions asking:

I. To what extent, if any, do the provisions of section 610.021(1) RSMo as contained in House Committee Substitute for Senate Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2 require a public governmental body to make public votes taken in a properly closed meeting.

a. a vote is taken to close (i.e., terminate without action) an investigation of a formal complaint which has been filed with a licensing board and properly logged as a complaint pursuant to the provisions of section 620.010.15(6) RSMO 1986 when the meeting was closed to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Beiser Ex Rel. Beiser v. Parkway School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. D.M. v. HoesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. A.B. v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API