Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 12, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. H. M. Remley, Judge. Action for damages occasioned by a collision with a street car. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Both parties appeal; that of defendant being first perfected.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

*425i. personal negligence; evidence. *424Third street, in Cedar Rapids, along which *425defendant operates a street railway, intersects P avenue. On the 15th of Juno, 1898, at about five o’clock p. -? the plaintiff, while riding a lady’s bicycle, C0Uided with one of its cars. With a loaf of bread tied to the handle bars and beefsteak in his pocket, he ■was riding on the north side of the road. He testified that he listened for, without hearing, the gong and rumble of the car, until he saw a team and wagon coming rapidly around the corner toward him. He first saw it when about twenty feet from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. May v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Palmer v. Cedar Rapids & Marion Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. McNeil v. LyonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898
  5. Caldwell v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cowan v. FlannerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. Burk v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. McVickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Godbey v. Grinnell Electric & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Hall v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API