Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1924No. 23,957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying it a new trial after its counterclaim had been disallowed by the exclusion of evidence offered in support thereof. The propriety of that ruling is the only thing now in question.

The counterclaim declares on plaintiff’s guaranty of 5 promissory notes, aggregating nearly $15,000, wherein he is payee and the Northern Michigan Land Company is the maker. The notes were ■each secured by a mortgage on land in Michigan. In payment of his subscription for certain stock of the defendant, plaintiff transferred the notes and assigned the mortgages to it. The notes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Winne v. LahartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Burnside v. CraigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Central Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Farmers Mer. Nat. Bk. of Cannon Falls v. DoffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Kiewel Securities Co. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Southern Minnesota Joint Stock Land Bank v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API