Daniel v. McHenry
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 55 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM OHIO CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Taylor's Landlord and Tenant, secs. 439 to 441. 7 Monroe, 616 ; Blight's heirs vs. Tobin. 7 Dana, 389 ; Howell's heirs vs. McCreary. 2 Mon., 413; Busey vs. Hardin. 3 Mar., 619; Patterson vs. Carnea!. 6 Mon., 30 ; Pepper vs. Commonwealth. 2 J. J. M., 68; Davidson vs. McMurtry. 7 J. J. M., 625; Carlile vs. Carlile. 3 Dana, 235; Stover vs. Boswell's heirs. 5Dana, 277; Addison vs. Crow. 7 Dana, 209 ; Adams vs.…
Read the full summary
CASE 55 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM OHIO CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Taylor's Landlord and Tenant, secs. 439 to 441. 7 Monroe, 616 ; Blight's heirs vs. Tobin. 7 Dana, 389 ; Howell's heirs vs. McCreary. 2 Mon., 413; Busey vs. Hardin. 3 Mar., 619; Patterson vs. Carnea!. 6 Mon., 30 ; Pepper vs. Commonwealth. 2 J. J. M., 68; Davidson vs. McMurtry. 7 J. J. M., 625; Carlile vs. Carlile. 3 Dana, 235; Stover vs. Boswell's heirs. 5Dana, 277; Addison vs. Crow. 7 Dana, 209 ; Adams vs. Keiser. 9 B. Mon., 35; Gearhart vs. Tharp. 12 B. Mon., 231; Isaacs vs. Gearhart. Revised Statutes, title “Execution,” art.…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion of the court:
Under six executions issued on six several judgments against Christopher Thomas, and all levied on a tract of land of about two hundred and forty acres, the appellee, H:. D. McHenry, bought'the entire tract for the amount considered collectable by the executions, and which was not more than half the value of the [land; and the sheriff, having so returned him as highest b|dder, and there being no redemption, conveyed the legal title to him as purchaser, on the satisfaction of the executions.
The appellant, R. J. Daniel, claimed the land under an…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Meehan v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Smith v. ScanlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899