In re Vanamee
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Kings county. Application of AViiliam Yanamee, as receiver of the AVarwick Machine Company, a corporation, for a warrant against AViiliam T. Baird for concealment and embezzlement of the property of said corporation, under Rev. tit. IT.
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term, Kings county. Application of AViiliam Yanamee, as receiver of the AVarwick Machine Company, a corporation, for a warrant against AViiliam T. Baird for concealment and embezzlement of the property of said corporation, under Rev. tit. IT. Y. (8th Ed.) p. 2528, § 12. The petition alleges that the petitioner was appointed and duly qualified as receiver of the Warwick Machine Company, a corporation, etc., and that he has published the notice required by law, warning all persons having in their possession property of the corporation to deliver the same to him, etc.; that…
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
Notice to the attorney general was necessary under chapter 378, Laws 1883. The act is very broad in its language. The attorney general is to be treated as an attorney who had appeared in the action, and even in ea; parte application. The act embraces an action pending for dissolution of corporations and for distribution of assets, and all proceedings in such actions. This is such an action.
The petition itself is insufficient. No facts are stated as a basis for the arrest of Baird. Assuming the regularity of the appointment of the receiver, and that he has the power of trustee of insolvent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Broadhead v. McConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Vredenburgh v. HendricksNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Blason v. BrunoNew York Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flatow v. Von BremsenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890
- Langdon v. New York Book Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891