Legal Opinion

Murray v. Murray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1912No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Ottawa; Padgham, J. Bill by Carrie Murray against Thomas W. Murray for divorce. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

I cannot agree with the conclusion reached by Justice Ostrander. He sufficiently states the averments of the bill of complaint. He also states in a general way what the testimony shows as to the striking of the complainant by defendant, and of the vile names he called her. It will not be necessary to detail the testimony in that respect further than to say that defendant, whenever under the influence of liquor, and this happened often, was ugly toward complainant and called her vile names, and struck her a good many times, leaving black and blue marks upon her person. I do not find anything…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berryman v. BerrymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Utley v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krusinski v. KrusinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API