Legal Opinion

Central Light & Fuel Co. v. Tyron

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1914No. 3164PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by W. H. 'Tyron against the Central Light & Fuel Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

In the trial court, plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendants for $200 damages sustained on account of alleged malicious criminal prosecution instituted against plaintiff by defendant Cantrell, the local manager of the Central Light & Fuel Company. Defendants’ answer put in issue all of the material allegations of plaintiff’s petition, and specifically denied that the criminal prosecution was instituted maliciously and without probable and reasonable cause, and further charged that the defendant Cantrell, acting for the defendant Central Light & Fuel Company,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. HixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Cooper v. FlemmingTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. LeClear v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lindsey v. CouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Allison v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bryan v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Robberson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Jones Leather Co. v. WoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Sims v. JaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API