Legal Opinion

Allen v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1918No. Civ. No. 2531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

STURTEVANT, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff, as administratrix of her mother’s estate, brought this action against the defendants to recover certain moneys which she alleged to be the property of the estate. The defendants had judgment in the trial court and the plaintiff appealed and has brought up the record under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendant, Fannie Smith, claims title to the moneys under an alleged gift from the plaintiff’s intestate. If this claim is sustained, the judgment should be affirmed. The defendant bank filed a disclaimer, and, for the purpose of clarity,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Burkett v. DotyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Francoeur v. BeattyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Spellacy v. DautermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Jones v. Bank of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Kohler v. KintzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API