Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Prizma, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 17, 1930No. 856PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
This is a bill in equity to obtain a patent under Rev. St. § 4915, as it was in 1922 (35 USCA § 63).
It seems that one Kelley, the predecessor in title of the defendant, was granted letters patent of the United States No. 1,259,-411, dated March 12, 1918, on coloring photographic images. On June 25, 1918, an application for a patent was filed by the plaintiff’s intestate making claim to the same invention covered by the Kelley patent, and an interference proceeding was duly instituted by the Commissioner of Patents. An examiner awarded all the claims to Hernandez except…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Frasch v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Greenwood v. DoverCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911
- Gold v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Curtiss Aeroplane & Motor Corp. v. JaninCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Uihlein v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- O'DONNELL v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933
- Powell v. McNamaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1933
- Greene v. BeidlerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1931