Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Engstrom

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2000No. 99-632PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 Patti Engstrom and the Montana Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) brought this action to enforce a Canadian child support order against Gerald Schmitz (Schmitz). Following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concluded that Schmitz owed back support in the amount of $14,705 and current/future support of $322 per month. The District Court reversed the ALJ’s decision, finding that the Canadian support order had been nullified by an order from a Hawaiian court two years earlier and Schmitz had no obligation of child support past or present. Engstrom and CSED appealed. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sellie v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re the Marriage of HopperMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re the Marriage of PetranekMontana Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re M.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Erler v. Creative Finance & Investments, L.L.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Marriage of PfeiferMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Estate of Athy v. EdgewoodMontana Supreme Court · 2026
  5. In Re MNMontana Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API