Legal Opinion
Household Finance Corp. v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 6, 1976No. 51307PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
There are no issues of fact to be resolved in this case. The litigation involves a suit filed by W. J. Rogers and Lena Rogers seeking the $100 penalty referred to in Code Ann. § 109A-9 — 404 for failure of the defendant to furnish them with a termination statement as provided in said Code section. The plaintiffs’ theory is that the loan was null and void, hence no security interest could be taken pursuant to the contract. The termination statement would authorize the removal of the security interest of record. The contract in question is virtually identical with
*316Argued September…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Crutcher v. Crawford Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Patman v. General Finance Corporation of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tally v. Atlanta National Real Estate TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Conner v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Dukes v. Household Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Household Finance Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Jenkins v. Commercial Credit Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.