Gonzales (Yadhir) v. State

doubt." Mitchell v. State, 124 Nev. 807, 816,

192 P.3d 721, 727

(2008) (internal quotations omitted). "This court will not disturb a jury verdict where there is substantial evidence to support it, and circumstantial evidence alone may support a conviction." Hernandez v. State, 118 Nev. 513, 531,

50 P.3d 1100, 1112

(2002). As to the burglary count, Gonzales argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was involved in the break-in, because the State's expert "could not testify with one hundred percent accuracy that the prints found at the crime scene belonged to…