Legal Opinion
De Filippo v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 8, 1975No. Nos. 74-1877, 74-1878PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
Cross appeals from a judgment entered after a jury’s answers to special interrogatories require us to decide whether the district court erred (1) in applying a principle of per se unreasonableness to conduct of Ford Motor Company and certain Philadelphia area Ford *1315dealers allegedly in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act and (2) in applying the Pennsylvania Statute of Frauds to defeat plaintiffs’ recovery for breach of contract. We reverse the district court’s resolution of the Sherman Act issue and affirm its action in interpreting the Uniform…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pennsylvania ex rel. Zimmerman v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Advent Systems Limited, in No. 90-1069 v. Unisys Corporation, in No. 90-1070Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Fray Chevrolet Sales, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Donald E. Fray v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.