Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Spiwak

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1975No. Docket 19260PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

Plaintiffs instituted suit against defendant claiming defendant negligently performed a tubal ligation on plaintiff, Helen Stephens, and that defendant breached a contract with plaintiffs allegedly assuring plaintiffs that Helen Stephens’ chances of pregnancy would be "nil” following the operation. Defendant denied malpractice, existence of a contract, and further denied that plaintiffs sustained damage. While defendant admitted he might have said "one chance in 500 or 1000”, he denied ever having said "nil” although he testified he might have said "almost nil”. From a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Haynes v. Monroe Plumbing & Heating Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Miller v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Joba Const. Co., Inc. v. Burns & Roe, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Warner v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Clapham v. YangaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Beadle v. AllisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API