Legal Opinion

Lane v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 21, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of city of Hopewell.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, Acts 1916, chapter 146, page 215. The indictment was in the form authorized by section 7 of the act. This section declares that “while any good and sufficient indictment may be used, an indictment for any first offense under sections 3, 4 and 5 of this act shall be sufficient if substantially in the form, or to the effect” set forth in that section. The only provision in either sections 3, 4 or 5 which bear upon the case is the provision in section 3 which declares that “it shall be unlawful for any person in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. Doyle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  3. Sawyers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hitt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API