Legal Opinion
City of Reno v. Harris
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1995No. 23679PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The property involved in this dispute (Hawkins House) is located in a residential area and was operated as a museum for several years by virtue of a special use permit granted in accordance with a zoning amendment designating the property a historic landmark in 1978. In 1992, an application was made by Don and Melinda Gustin (the Gustins), to amend the use permit to allow for limited office use. The City of Reno Board of Adjustment (the Board) recommended against approval; the Reno City Council (Reno Council) reversed the recommendation and approved the application for the special use…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- The People v. WallenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Randolph Vine Associates v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- City of Burley v. McCaslin Lumber Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Estate of Hughes v. First National Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. BartgisNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- County of Clark v. DoumaniNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- The Metropolitan Government of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee v. The Board of Zoning Appeals Of Nashville And Davidson County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Rossetti v. Chittenden County Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- BOARD OF SUP'RS v. Bd. of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.