Legal Opinion

Limpin v. State of California

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 2, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00037Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELCHOR LIMPIN, Case No.: 23-cv-037-JES-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP, 13 v. DISMISSING COMPLAINT & DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., COUNSEL 15 Defendants. [ECF Nos. 2 and 3] 16 17 On January 9, 2023, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging four 18 causes of action against numerous defendants. Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Leave to 19 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and a Motion to 20 Appoint Counsel. ECF Nos. 2, 3. For the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API