Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schiedt v. Dimick

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 20, 1934No. 2884Published

1DissentMobton, Circuit Judge

I regret that I am unable to agree, and, as the question is of some general importance, I will state my views.

The essential facts are simple. The plaintiff sued the defendant at law to recover damages for personal injuries, and obtained a verdiet. He regarded the verdict as much too small, and moved to set it aside on the ground of inadequacy of damages. The trial judge made an order that: “If the defendant will file in this case a stipulation consenting to an increase of $1,000 in the damages from the sum of $500, as found by the jury, to $1,500, on or before April 21, 1933, the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Denny v. PironiSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Tevis v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API