Legal Opinion

Tomsic v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1996No. 95-4002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs/appellants Irene' Tomsic and Sheila Browning appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant/appellee State Farm on their Title VII gender discrimination claims. 1 Tomsic v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 870 F.Supp. 318 (D.Utah 1994). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

I

Plaintiffs were hired on April 1, 1991, as trainee agents of defendant. 2 Employment as a trainee agent is temporary, lasting at most two years. Employees who successfully complete the training program become agents with the defendant under a contractual…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 137, 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,103 Irene P. Tomsic and Sheila Browning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation and Norman MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. BetcheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API