Legal Opinion

Harold Furnace Co. v. Johnson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1951No. 22064PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal on questions of law, the record shows that the plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, filed its petition in the Municipal Court of Cleveland against Doris Alexander, William and Ruth Johnson for the sum of $331.19, plus interest, being balance claimed to be due for a furnace installed by plaintiff in a residence occupied by Doris Alexander as a tenant but owned by the defendant, Ruth Johnson. The *178trial court rendered judgment against all three defendants in the sum of $404.01 and costs. From this judgment only the defendants, William and Ruth Johnson, have perfected an appeal…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowers v. Viereck, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API