Legal Opinion

Mortgage & Contract Co. v. Linenberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1932No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 35,808PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice WIEST except that portion wherein he holds that Mrs. Obenauer's guaranty of payment does not apply to the amount due plaintiff under the acceleration clause of the contract being foreclosed. In that holding I cannot concur. While a former notice of the vendee's default had been given to Mrs. Obenauer by plaintiff, the record does not show that she was given notice of the defaults which led to this foreclosure. My Brother's decision is based, as he states, upon the proposition that:

"Defendant Obenauer was entitled to notice of default before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Palmer v. SchrageMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Angelo Iafrate Co. v. M & K Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API