Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hoffman v. Judge of Division B, Civil Dist. Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 5, 1921No. 24556PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application by the State, on the relation of Daniel H. Hoffman, Jr., for an order to show cause why a writ of mandamus should-not issue to compel the Judge of Division B, Civil District Court, to rescind an ex parte order of continuance of hearing of a rule against the Southern Bonded Warehouse Company, Incorporated. Proceedings dismissed, with leave to renew.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rule to Show Cause.

MONROE, C. J.

This is an application for an order directing the judge, made respondent, to show cause -why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding him to rescind an ex parte order continuing until ten days after the adjournment of the constitutional convention, now in session, the hearing of a rule requiring the defendant (Southern Bonded Warehouse Company, Incorporated), in the suit No. 135689 of the docket of that court, to show cause, upon grounds set forth, why it should not be enjoined from making further *365use of the name adopted by it. The order to show cause…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bates v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Levert v. E. Gajan, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. State v. FleckingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API