Legal Opinion

Medusa Portland Cement Co. v. Marion Coal & Supply Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1964No. Appeal, No. 54PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The plaintiff has appealed from the denial of his motion for judgment on the pleadings in an action on a book account for goods sold and delivered in July and August 1962 “at the special instance and request of the defendant.”

The defendant corporation’s answer, sworn to by its president, states: “For the reasons set forth hereinafter under ‘New Matter’, the defendant is without sufficient knowledge, after reasonable investigation, to form an opinion as to the truth or falsity of the averments . . . and verily believes that the exclusive knowledge thereof is in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elia v. OlszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. KaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Sayre Land Co. v. Sayre BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Cokely v. StippSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Anders v. Russo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cercone v. CerconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. City of Philadelphia v. KennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Del Quadro v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. JosephSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Pilotti v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API