Legal Opinion

Amanda Miguel Baez Sanchez v. Steve Hinkley et al.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 20, 2026No. 1:26-cv-02229Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ AMANDA MIGUEL BAEZ SANCHEZ, Petitioner, Case No. 1:26-cv-2229 v. Honorable Paul L. Maloney STEVE HINKLEY et al., Respondents. ____________________________/ OPINION Petitioner, a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainee, initiated this action by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Pet., ECF No. 1.) For the following reasons, the Court will deny the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

without prejudice. Discussion I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. A.A.R.P. v. TrumpSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  4. Dada v. MukaseySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. M-A-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API