Legal Opinion
Foster v. Division of Adult Parole Operations
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 23, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00987Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLOYD FOSTER JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00987-LJO-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT SECOND 13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO 14 DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE STATE A CLAIM OPERATIONS, et al., 15 (ECF No. 13) Defendants. 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 17 18 Floyd Foster Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2019, a screening order was filed finding 20 that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.