Legal Opinion
Tingle v. Hebert
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided April 16, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15–626–JWD–EWDPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 116) filed by Defendants Troy Hebert and the Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control of the State of Louisiana ("ATC") (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiff Brette Tingle opposes the *680motion. (Doc. 137.) Defendants have filed a reply. (Doc. 145.) Oral argument is not necessary. For the following reasons, the Defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff is a former employee of the ATC. Plaintiff was terminated from his job by Troy Hebert,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoot Systems L L C v. Comal Concrete Products IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020