Perlotte v. Perlotte
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. It is reversible error to charge a jury in a divorce case that, if the jury grants one party a divorce as a matter of law, the opposite party should also be granted a divorce. While some lower courts seemingly have misconstrued the 1960 amendment to Code Ann. § 30-122 (Ga. L. 1960, pp. 1024, 1025), “rights and disabilities” and “divorce” are not synonymous terms. See Moon v. Moon, 216 Ga. 627 (118 SE2d 473); McCartney v. McCartney, 217 Ga. 200 (121 SE2d 785). Since the contentions of the parties here diametrically oppose each other, the charge was confusing,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hightower v. AnsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- McCartney v. McCartneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Whelchel v. Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Moon v. MoonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Brackett v. BrackettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schwartz v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Blackshear v. BlackshearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Childs v. ChildsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Blackshear v. BlackshearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Blackshear v. BlackshearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974